### Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Puzzle’

## Area 48

Today I was looking at some of Ed Southall’s (@solvemymaths) puzzles on his website. I saw this one that I had not seen before: I thought I’d give it a crack. You should too….. go on…. Did you get an answer? Well here is how I approached it:

First I did a little sketch, as I always tell my students to do: I labelled the points with letters as this is normally quite a good way of keeping track of things.

I then decided to let AB = 1 (I chose that bit to be 1 as I knew a unit square would lead to lots of fractions, in hindsight this also let to fractions and AB = 2 would have been better.) This gave me a few lengths straight off the bat, and I could find BD by Pythagoras’s Theorem and hence had the area of the larger square – which I need to answer the question.

I also noticed I had a RAT (ABD) and I knew the perpendicular sides, and therefore could work out the area. I then looked at the triangle BCH. This looked like it would be similar to ABD but I took a couple of moments to justify it to myself before moving on, just in case….

If angle ABD is x then as DAB and BCH are both 90 and the angle sums of a triangle and on a straight line are both 180 then CBH and BDA must both equal 90 – x and CHB must equal x, hence they are similar. They are similar and the scale factor is 2 (as BC is half of AD and they are corresponding sides).

Hence the Area scale factor is 4 and the area pf BCH is a quarter of the area ABD. As Area ABD = 1 then Area BCH = ¼.

From here I took the area of the two triangles away from the area of the square ACED to get the shaded area and put it over the area of the larger square. (Well, after momentarily putting it over the area of the smaller square like a fool!). I went for a coordinate geometry approach (coordinate geometry seems to have taken over from trig as my brains go to method). I chose the origin as the common corner of the two squares and called the point where the vertex meets the horizontal point B. This mean B’s coordinates were (1,2). I called this line l1 and could spot its equation was 2x. Part of the shaded area is the area under this curve between x = 0 and x = 1 so I calculated that area to be 1. The perpendicular through B is the other line that bounds the top of our shaded region. I know the perpendicular gradiens multiply to -1 and I know it goes through point (1,2) so I could work out the equation of this line easy enough: Then calculate the area below it between the values x = 1 and x = 2. This gave an area of 7/4. So I had a total shaded area of 11/4 and could divide this by the area of the large square to get 11/20 again. I felt happier now that I had the same answer though two different methods, and I stress to my students that this is what they should be doing with any extra time in exams. Doing different methods and seeing if they get the same answer!

I hope you tried Ed’s puzzle, and if you did, please let me know how you approached it.

Categories: Maths

## Nice area puzzle

Yesterday evening I came across this lovely area puzzle on twitter:  The puzzle is from Gerry McNally (@mcnally_gerry) he says its his first, and I hope that’s “first of many”.

I reached for the nearest pen and paper and had a quick go: As you can see, I misread the puzzle originally and thought the lower quadrilateral was a square. The large triangle is isosceles as given in the question. This allowed me to use the properties of similar triangles and the base lengths given to work out the areas of the square, both right angled triangles and the whole triangle. This then allowed me to calculate the area of the shaded quadrilateral and hence that area as a fraction of the whole.

Then I went to tweet my solution to Gerry and realised that nowhere does it say that the bottom quadrilateral is a square. I had added an assumption. This made me ponder the question some more. Instincts told me that it didn’t have to be a square, but that the solution would be the sane whether it was a square or not. But I didn’t want to leave it at that, I wanted to be sure, so I had another go.

I sketched out the triangle again: This time I called the height of the rectangle x.

This made it trivial to find the area’s of the rectangle and the triangle GCD. Triangle HAB was easy enough to find using similar triangle properties. and then I found the area of the whole shape again using similarity to discover the height. This allowed me to find the shaded area: Then when I put it as a fraction the xs cancelled and it of course reduced to the same answer. I really like this puzzle, and would be interested to see how you approached it, please let me know in the comments or on social media.

## Saturday puzzle

One of the first things I saw this morning when I awoke was this post from solve my maths on facebook: That’s interesting I thought, so I thought it have a go.

The radius is given to be 2. So we have an equilateral triangle side length 2. Using my knowledge of triangle and exact trig ratios I know the height of such a triangle is root 3 and as such so is the area.

Similarly, as the diagonal of the rectangle is 2 and the short side is 1 we can work out from Pythagoras’s Theorem that the longer side is root 3. And again it follows that so is the area.

Lastly we have the square, the diagonal is 2 and as such each side must be root 2, again this is evident from Pythagoras’s Theorem  this gives us an area of 2.

Which leaves us a nice product of the areas as 6.

I think that is correct, I’ve justvwoken up nd this post has been my working, so do about up if you spot an error. And I’d love to hear if youbsolved it a different way.

Categories: GCSE, Maths, SSM, Uncategorized

## An excellent puzzle – alternate methods

Yesterday I wrote this post looking at a nice puzzle I’d seen and how I solved it.

The puzzle again: Lovely, isn’t It?

After I published my previous post I wondered if I may have been better using a vector approach or a coordinate geometry approach. So I gave them a try.

Coordinate Geometry

I started by sketching the figure against an axis. I place the origin at the centre of the circle, worked out the equation if the circle and the right leg of the triangle and solved simultaneously for x. Giving x =1 and x=1/3. These x values correspond to half the base of each triangle, which shows the scale factor from the large triangle to the small one is 1/3. As the area of the large one is rt2 this gives the area of the small as rt2/9.

I like this method, probably a little better than the one prior to it.

Vectors

First I sketched it out and reasoned I could work it out easy enough with 4 vectors. I saw that I could write AC as a sum of two others: I knew that the length of AC was 1 so I used Pythagoras’s Theorem to calculate mu. It left me with the exact same quadratic to solve. This time mu was the fraction of DB needed so was automatically the length scale factor. The rest falls out as it did before.

As well as this, Colin Beveridge (@icecolbeveridge), maths god and general legend, tweeted a couple of 1 tweet solutions. First he used trig identities:

Trig Identities I assumed this was right, but checked it through to ensure I knew why was going on: We can see beta is 2 x alpha and as such the tan value is correct. The cos value (although it is missing a negative sign that I’m sure Colin missed to test me) follows from Pythagoras’s Theorem: This is again the scale factor as it is half the base of the small triangle and the base if large triangle is 2.

Complex Numbers

Then Colin tweeted this: At first I wasn’t totally sure I followed so I asked for further clarification: I had a moment of stupidity: And then saw where Colin was going. I tried to work it through, by way of explaining here in a better manner.

I sketched it out and reasoned the direction of lines: Then I normalised that and equated imaginary parts to get the same scale factor: I am happy that is is valid, and that it shows Colin is right, but I’m not entirely sure this as the exact method Colin was meaning. He has promised a blog on the subject so I will add a link when it comes.

I like all these methods. I dontvthink I would have though of Colin’s methods myself though. I’d love to hear another methods you see.

## An interesting area puzzle

Regular readers will know that I have a tendency to collect puzzles and I like to have a go at them. This evening I had a crack at this while my daughter was playing before bed. It looked interesting when I saw it on Facebook a while ago and so I thought I’d have a crack. If you haven’t yet, do it now. I want to know if you took the same approach!

I wasn’t too sure where to start, so I drew it out, labelled some stuff and came up with some equations: I thought if I multiples two of my equations together and rearranged I could get the yellow area as the subject: Then I needed cx: I thought “now I need ay”, then realised I had it: This meant I could.sub back in through the equations: So the area: I thought 27 was a nice answer, and I’m fairly sure it’s correct, however I have a feeling that I may have missed something blindingly obvious that would have gotten me there much quicker.

If you did it, I’d love to hear your approach, especially if you spotted something I missed!

Categories: #MTBoS, Maths, SSM, Starters

## A nice little triangle puzzle

Here is a nice little puzzle I saw from brilliant.org on Facebook. Have you worked it out yet?

Here’s what I did:

First I drew a diagram (obviously). And worked out the area of the triangle.

Then the area of each sector. Leaving a subtraction to finish.

Categories: #MTBoS, Maths, Starters Tags: , ,

## Circles puzzle

Here’s a lovely puzzle I saw on Brilliant.org this week: It’s a nice little workout. I did it entirely in my head and that is my challenge to you. Do it, go on. Do it now….